- Scotland branch
- Wales branch
- Northern Ireland branch
- North East branch
- Yorkshire and Humberside branch
- North West branch
- Midlands branch
- South branch (inc. London)
- South Coastal branch
- South West branch
21 June 2016
Justice Reinvestment and Social Justice: Beyond ‘What Works’
Seminar by Professor Julie Stubbs, University of New South Wales, Australia
Julie Stubbs is a criminologist and Professor in the Faculty of Law at the University of New South Wales, in Sydney, Australia. Much of her research focuses on women and criminal justice including women’s imprisonment, justice reinvestment, restorative justice, domestic violence law reforms, homicide, battered woman syndrome and sexual assault. Her publications include two new books: Justice Reinvestment: Winding Back Imprisonment(Brown et al, 2016, Palgrave Macmillan) and Australian Violence (co-edited with Tomsen, forthcoming 2016, Federation Press). She is a member of the International Advisory Board of the British Journal of Criminology. Julie is visiting London and Glasgow as part of her current research on alternatives to women’s imprisonment.
3-4- March 2016
Symposium on the Legal Regulation and Policing of Commercial Sex, Queen’s University Belfast
The Commercial Sex Research Network Ireland (CSRNI) is an all-Ireland interdisciplinary network for researchers critically engaged in the area of commercial sex and sex work in Ireland. Funded by the Irish Research Council under the New Foundations scheme, the network is being developed between in a three-way partnership between the University of Limerick, NUI Galway and the Schools’ of Law and Sociology, Social Policy and Social Work at Queen’s University, Belfast, thus ensuring important cross-border links. The aims of the network are to provide a much-needed space for interdisciplinary collaboration and dissemination of research activities nationally and internationally.
As part of the CSRNI network the School of Law and the School of Sociology, Social Policy and Social Work at Queen’s University, Belfast hosted a symposium on commercial sex on March 3 – 4. This event was sponsored by the British Society of Criminology (Northern Ireland) Regional Group. While the emphasis of the symposium was on developments that are occurring in Ireland (North and South) issues around commercial sex in other jurisdictions including Britain and Sweden / Norway were also considered. Topics discussed include: the role of the digital economy in the buying and selling of sexual services; the policing of commercial sex; legislative changes and the criminalisation of demand; and feminist responses to commercial sex.
The aim of the symposium was to share analyses of the prevalence and regulation of commercial sex in Ireland, and to draw upon best practice lessons from other jurisdictions. The symposium brought together academics, NGOs and those involved in commercial sex in Ireland.
Weakness as Routine: Contributing to a research agenda on the weak field of global justice
(in association with Bangor Social Sciences Research Seminar Series)
Dr Sara Dezalay (Cardiff University)
Wednesday October 25, 2017.
Bangor University, Alun A201
How can one account for the contrast between the protracted weakness of the International Criminal Court and the strength of a global justice discourse focused on the criminalization of state and societal violence? To address this puzzle, this article suggests the hypothesis of global justice as a “weak field” that is a space that is weak as regards its internal autonomy but not weak in its wider social effects. Looking at professional patterns within the ICC, and the way in which evidence is marshalled into the Court, its gist is that weakness is not a transitory feature – rather it has developed into a routine as a structural feature of the ICC, and the broader field of global justice. Grounded in Bourdieu’s field theory, it relies on biographical interviews with ICC staff, academics and members of non-governmental operating around the Court.
(In association with Cardiff University, Centre for Crime, Law and Justice research seminar series)
The politics of security in the case of Brussels after the bombings
Dr. Elke Devroe (Leiden University) & Professor Paul Ponsaers (Ghent University)
October 11, 2017
The basic proposition of the paper is that politics matters in explaining major problems of crime and insecurity, such as the recent spate of terrorist incidents in European cities. The politics of security is central to an understanding of the conditions that enable or frustrate such incidents and ought to be as central to social scientific research as are official preoccupations with the attitudes of perpetrators. Understanding the conditions of ‘radicalisation’ is as important as understanding the lifestyle and choices of the ‘radicalised’. To this end, the paper provides a case study of the politics of security in Brussels, a city directly implicated in the attacks on Paris in November 2015 as well as being a target for political violence itself, in March 2016.
Prior to the bombings of 22nd March 2016, the Belgian Federal Government had developed an ambitious counterterrorist programme focussed on the neighbourhood of Molenbeek in Brussels, which had served as a base for those involved in the attack on Paris on 15th November 2015. The federal structure of the country and the particularly complex arrangements for governing the Brussels Capital Region hindered the implementation of this programme. In its initial response, the Federal Government broadened the scope and enforcement of the criminal law against offenders and then sought to manage the risks of further terrorist incidents by targeting, for proactive interventions, those known or suspected by the authorities of embarking upon terrorist careers. This was to the detriment of the broader preventive social policy approach favoured by the regional government of Brussels but undermined by cuts in public expenditure (Edwards, Devroe & Ponsaers, 2017). The proactive strategy of the Federal Government was severely criticised by human rights organisations whilst international criticisms focused on Belgium’s allegedly weak security policies and complex governing arrangements, even depicting the country as a ‘failed state’. However, this depiction neglects the important efforts and progress made in a short period and the emerging threats posed by “returnees”, those now returning to European metropolises, such as Brussels, having fought in Syria and Iraq. It is argued that this emerging challenge emphasises the importance of a more holistic policy response capable of integrating enforcement, risk management and social prevention.
19 May 2017
New Directions in Criminology: Theory and Method
The North East Branch of the British Society of Criminology hosted this half-day event New Directions in Criminology: Theory and Method. The aim of the event was to generate discussion and debate on a wide range of theoretical and methodological issues in criminology.
12.00 Coffee and introductions
12.30 Pam Davies (Northumbria) – ‘Children as Victims’
13.00 Mark Horsley (Teesside) – ‘Forget ‘Moral Panics’’
13.30 Jo Large (Teesside) – ‘Conspicuously Doing Charity: Exploring harm within the context of charity based tourism. A challenge for criminologists to address?’
14.00 Coffee break
14.30 Thomas Raymen (Plymouth) – ‘Show Me The Money: Developing a transcendental materialist theory of gambling addiction’
15.00 Mike Rowe (Northumbria) – ‘Policing and Visual Cultures’
15.30 Simon Winlow (Teesside) – ‘Criminology’s present crisis, and what we can do about it’
November 1, 2017
The Yorkshire and Humberside Regional Event on Contemporary Research in Crime and Justice took place at the University of Hull.
10 May 2017
Hosted by the Centre for Crime, Law and Justice, University of Lancaster Law School.
Ethical issues in criminological research are an increasingly complex matter. Consideration of issues around safety, informed consent, ‘guilty knowledge’ and disclosure, the limits of ‘participation’ in participant observation, the protection of vulnerable populations and so on, leads to a complex set of interlinked concerns. The aim of this one day conference is to examine these issues more closely. Invited speakers have conducted research which brought with it specific ethical considerations and will present papers outlining how these were tackled and ‘overcome’.
|Prof. Teela Sanders (Keynote)||University of Leicester||Sex industry|
|Dr. Raphael Schelmbach||University of Brighton||Policing protest; activist research|
|Dr. Anthony Ellis||Salford University||Male violence & far right politics|
|Dr. Irene Zempi||Nottingham University||Islamophobia|
|Dr. Jennifer Fleetwood||Goldsmiths, UoL||Female drug mules|
|Joanna Hill||University College London||Wildlife poaching in Uganda|
|Dr. Karenza Moore||Lancaster University||Drug use; illegal leisure|
|Dr. Gary Potter||Lancaster University||Cannabis cultivation|
|Dr. Sarah Kingston||Lancaster University||Prostitution|
The event took place at Lancaster University, Faculty of the Arts and Social Sciences, Main Room.
December 13, 2017. 6-8pm, Trinity Chapel, De Montfort University, Leicester
We welcomed three esteemed experts to reflect on their own contributions to the field of punishment. Professor Rob Canton’s recent book Why Punish? An Introduction to the Philosophy of Punishment prompted us to think about punishment. The evening reflected on Rob’s important question to consider how our society responds to and deals with punishment.
Professor Rob Canton, DMU
Professor Anne Worrall, Keele University
Professor Gavin Dingwall, DMU
Wednesday November 15, 2017
Vijay Patel Building Room 2.02, De Montfort University
This event was free.
Chair: Professor Neil Chakraborti, Head of Department and Director of the Centre for Hate Studies, Department of Criminology, University of Leicester
Panel session members:
Professor Neil Chakraborti, Head of Department and Director of the Centre for Hate Studies, Department of Criminology, University of Leicester
Kim Sadique, Senior Lecturer in Community & Criminal Justice, De Montfort University
Dr Irene Zempi, Lecturer in Criminology, Nottingham Trent University
Any queries about the event please contact us: email@example.com
Hate crime has become an increasingly pernicious problem in many parts of the world, with numbers of incidents rising to record levels and causing devastating emotional and physical damage to victims, their families and wider communities. Within the UK last June’s EU referendum result was the catalyst for a surge in reports of targeted violence, while similar spikes have been seen within the US since the election of President Trump after a prolonged campaign of heated rhetoric and a slow disavowal of white supremacy. Equally alarming levels of hate crime have been documented across Europe with populist political parties in countries such as France, Denmark, Germany, Hungary and the Netherlands exploiting anti-immigrant sentiment, fuelling the scapegoating of particular minority groups and feeding off widely-held anxieties.
Within this context the need for fresh responses to hate crime has become all the more pressing. Despite progress within the domains of scholarship and policy, these escalating levels of hate crime – and the associated rise in tensions, demonisation and hostility towards ‘difference’ that accompanies such spikes – casts doubt over the effectiveness of existing measures and their capacity to protect victims of hate crime. As such, this session draws from extensive fieldwork conducted by the panel members to examine the nature, impact and implications of hate crime. In addition to identifying the different forms that hate crime can take and their associated harms, the panel consider ways in which existing faultlines within criminal justice responses compound the sense of distress and alienation felt by victims from a diverse range of communities. They also explore ways in which criminological debate can reach beyond its own echo chamber to connect with ‘real-world’ hate crime responses and experiences, and call for urgent action to plug the ever-widening chasm between state-level narratives and victims’ lived realities.
5th July 2017, De Montfort University
Dr Irene Zempi
Since the Macpherson Report, there has been pressure on the police to increase diversity of police staff. Although British police have recently recruited greater numbers of minority police officers, they still remain vastly outnumbered by their white, heterosexual, male counterparts. Drawing on data from qualitative interviews with 20 participants based in a force in the UK, we examined police officers’ experiences of hostility, discrimination and exclusion internally in the police (Mawby & Zempi, 2016). Although there is a lot of research focusing on police officers’ experiences of racism in the police, other aspects of their identity remain under-researched. In this study, we employed intersectionality (the presence of multiple aspects of identity) in order to examine police officers’ experiences of bias, prejudice and ‘hate’ perpetrated by work colleagues and supervisors. The findings show widespread hostility, discrimination and exclusion towards minority police officers, especially those with multiple and intersecting personal identities.
9 May 2017
Professor Robert Reiner, LSE
‘Crime: The mystery of a common-sense concept’ 4pm, Mayfield House, Falmer Campus, University of Brighton.
10 January 2018
Beth Weaver (Strathclyde)
Vincenzo Ruggiero (Middlesex)
‘Political Violence: A Typology’
8 November 2017
Annette Ballinger (Keele)
Women convicted of homicide
11 October 2017
Scott Decker (Arizona)
The Promise of Ethnography: Gangs, Active Offenders and Policy
13 December 2016
Dr Steve Wakeman from the Centre for Crime, Criminalisation and Social Exclusion, Liverpool John Moores University presented: RETHINKING HEROIN IN ‘AUSTERITY BRITAIN’: AN ETHNOGRAPHIC STUDY.
Abstract: This presentation provided an overview of the main findings from an (auto)ethnographic exploration of heroin use in a disadvantaged area of the United Kingdom. Drawing on recent developments in Continental philosophy and criminological theory, questions will be posed around the ways in which changing patterns of heroin use can best be understood. The implications of such understandings will then be considered in the context of wider debates about drug treatment methods and drug policy revision. A core claim running through the presentation is this: in the UK’s rapidly evolving landscape of intoxication, criminologists in particular must not lose sight of the growing array of problems faced by a small but significant section of long-term problematic heroin users.
Dr Steve Wakeman is a senior lecturer in criminology, based in the Centre for Crime, Criminalisation and Social Exclusion at Liverpool John Moores University. His research interests fall across three fields: drugs, media, and theoretical criminology. For details of his published works and ongoing research projects go to:
Tweets as @Steve_Wakeman